![]() During this lockdown, the Indian government enacted several emergency legislations to provide direct and indirect relief to workers and households. Rural households, including smallholders, were affected by loss in migrant income, livelihood and farm and non-farm incomes. Here, the authors show that removing this support will not reduce global GHG emissions by much rather it will need to be radically redirected to contribute to climate change mitigation.ĬVOID-19 induced significant economic and social disruptions in India. Agricultural sectors receive US$600 billion per year in government support, providing incentives for GHG emission-intensive production. Substantially reducing GHG emissions from agriculture while safeguarding food security requires a more comprehensive revamping of existing support to agriculture and food consumption. Here, we find that, while over the years the government support has incentivized the development of high-emission farming systems, at present, the support only has a small impact in terms of inducing additional global GHG emissions from agricultural production partly because support is not systematically biased towards high-emission products, and partly because support generated by trade protection reduces demand for some high-emission products by raising their consumer prices. ![]() No rigorous quantification of the impact of this support on GHG emissions has been available. Agriculture receives around US$600 billion per year worldwide in government support. Agriculture and land-use change account for a quarter of total global emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG). ![]() Lessons and implications, along with future study topics, are discussed.Īgricultural production is strongly affected by and a major contributor to climate change. In contrast, those who follow CABM are characterized by relatively low productivity and continuous hardships. ![]() Case study results suggest that farmers that adopt SABM are innovative and productive with a better quality of life. Their practices are examined with key performance indicators (KPIs) regarding strategic focus, labor productivity, vital resources usage, soil maintenance, output quality, and revenue performance. Innovative farmers were selected from different parts of India. This SABM is compared with the conventional agricultural business model (CABM). In this context, this paper presents a sustainable agricultural business model (SABM), which defines contexts, practices, and outcomes. The Indian government has introduced pro-farmer schemes and policies for their quality of life, but the improvement rate of their quality of life is still relatively slow. Agriculture and allied sectors are the mainstays of the Indian rural population and yet, the vast majority is still poor. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |